<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cllr. Cooke&#039;s Blog.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevecooke.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevecooke.org</link>
	<description>Political Musings from the Greater Manchester.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:28:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6-beta1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Independent pulls out of race by Richard Carvath</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/03/04/indepentent-pulls-out-of-race/comment-page-1/#comment-25043</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Carvath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=1081#comment-25043</guid>
		<description>You must know something I don&#039;t RB.  I&#039;ve agreed to do a live interview with Mark Whitehead.  I&#039;ve not agreed to taking questions on air direct from members of the public phoning in.  If indeed that&#039;s what Salford City Radio has in mind then it should notify me quick sharp because nobody has said anything to me about taking part in any phone-in session.  I&#039;ve already warned Salford City Radio that if they think they&#039;re going to attempt some Paxmanesque stunt then they&#039;ll get the full guns blazing Carvath treatment back - which is a level of intensity I rarely go to, and only when absolutely necessary - but I will fire a full point-blank broadside if the need arises.  I&#039;m already sick of smart-ass journalists and the more scum elements of the Salford public [typically left-wing extremists] and so I do operate a &#039;shoot on sight, shoot to kill&#039; policy on slanderers and character assassins.  If I turn up and I assess Mark Whitehead as being motivated only to make mischief then I&#039;ll just walk out as I won&#039;t have my time wasted.  Furthermore if he presents me with pre-prepared awkward questions that are obviously loaded and unreasonable to be asked on the spot [but which would be fine given the opportunity for prior preparation] then, again, I&#039;ll just be off - not least because the audience figure for Salford City Radio is probably tiny so it&#039;s barely worth the bother for the potential benefit anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must know something I don&#8217;t RB.  I&#8217;ve agreed to do a live interview with Mark Whitehead.  I&#8217;ve not agreed to taking questions on air direct from members of the public phoning in.  If indeed that&#8217;s what Salford City Radio has in mind then it should notify me quick sharp because nobody has said anything to me about taking part in any phone-in session.  I&#8217;ve already warned Salford City Radio that if they think they&#8217;re going to attempt some Paxmanesque stunt then they&#8217;ll get the full guns blazing Carvath treatment back &#8211; which is a level of intensity I rarely go to, and only when absolutely necessary &#8211; but I will fire a full point-blank broadside if the need arises.  I&#8217;m already sick of smart-ass journalists and the more scum elements of the Salford public [typically left-wing extremists] and so I do operate a &#8217;shoot on sight, shoot to kill&#8217; policy on slanderers and character assassins.  If I turn up and I assess Mark Whitehead as being motivated only to make mischief then I&#8217;ll just walk out as I won&#8217;t have my time wasted.  Furthermore if he presents me with pre-prepared awkward questions that are obviously loaded and unreasonable to be asked on the spot [but which would be fine given the opportunity for prior preparation] then, again, I&#8217;ll just be off &#8211; not least because the audience figure for Salford City Radio is probably tiny so it&#8217;s barely worth the bother for the potential benefit anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Independent pulls out of race by Roger Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/03/04/indepentent-pulls-out-of-race/comment-page-1/#comment-25042</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=1081#comment-25042</guid>
		<description>Did God tell you that when he gave you permission to film in church by any chance Richard?

Don&#039;t worry about making a public statment about that or the fiasco with that house because I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll find that the phones will be red hot on your advertised radio interview asking those questions and we can hear your answers then..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did God tell you that when he gave you permission to film in church by any chance Richard?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry about making a public statment about that or the fiasco with that house because I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll find that the phones will be red hot on your advertised radio interview asking those questions and we can hear your answers then..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Independent pulls out of race by Richard Carvath</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/03/04/indepentent-pulls-out-of-race/comment-page-1/#comment-25041</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Carvath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=1081#comment-25041</guid>
		<description>I will win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Independent pulls out of race by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/03/04/indepentent-pulls-out-of-race/comment-page-1/#comment-25039</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=1081#comment-25039</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll note that my prediction is &lt;1% - less than one percent. I think we probably agree on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll note that my prediction is &lt;1% &#8211; less than one percent. I think we probably agree on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Worsley Road Brothel by Roger Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2009/07/02/worsley-road-brothel/comment-page-1/#comment-25037</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=769#comment-25037</guid>
		<description>Edit...

Its taken me less than five min to find the information on who funds the health visitors Richard. Just how incompetent are you, surely you must as a PPC be capable of doing some research and checking??

Its a charity based organisation though it looks like from what I can see at a quick glance that they do receive some limited goverment funding.

Again the fact you can&#039;t even find information freely available on the net shows just how &quot;informed&quot; you are doesn&#039;t it.. 

Oh and every time you call people perverts you will be reported for it so keep it up you bigot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edit&#8230;</p>
<p>Its taken me less than five min to find the information on who funds the health visitors Richard. Just how incompetent are you, surely you must as a PPC be capable of doing some research and checking??</p>
<p>Its a charity based organisation though it looks like from what I can see at a quick glance that they do receive some limited goverment funding.</p>
<p>Again the fact you can&#8217;t even find information freely available on the net shows just how &#8220;informed&#8221; you are doesn&#8217;t it.. </p>
<p>Oh and every time you call people perverts you will be reported for it so keep it up you bigot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Worsley Road Brothel by Roger Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2009/07/02/worsley-road-brothel/comment-page-1/#comment-25036</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=769#comment-25036</guid>
		<description>So any comment about the picture FIVE YEARS out of date Richard or an apology to the young family ??

Oh and as YOU have stated that YOU are the leader and public face I think you will find that YOU are the person who can be taken to court for libel by this family.

Any comment on exactly WHO gave you permission to film in the church Richard because you can be sure that question will be asked until you do answer it , at live interview perhaps??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So any comment about the picture FIVE YEARS out of date Richard or an apology to the young family ??</p>
<p>Oh and as YOU have stated that YOU are the leader and public face I think you will find that YOU are the person who can be taken to court for libel by this family.</p>
<p>Any comment on exactly WHO gave you permission to film in the church Richard because you can be sure that question will be asked until you do answer it , at live interview perhaps??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Worsley Road Brothel by Richard Carvath</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2009/07/02/worsley-road-brothel/comment-page-1/#comment-25035</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Carvath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=769#comment-25035</guid>
		<description>Interesting confession from pro-prostitution RB, the bit about &quot;...women involved in prostitution...&quot;!  (Thanks but we already know).  (And that&#039;s also a working definition under English law of an illegal brothel).  For the record, I am not responsible for the day-to-day operation of BrothelWatch or its activities on the internet; I am really just a figurehead, a public point of contact for the press or the police for what is a covert anti-brothel campaign undertaken by anonymous volunteers.  (As a public figurehead I also serve various tactical purposes of use to the campaign as well).  The photos of cars in the car park that the A-Team sometimes post on their blog are exactly that: photos of cars in a brothel&#039;s car park, nothing more, and there is nothing illegal about that.

If an NHS health visitor (funded by taxpayers&#039; money) really is complicit in facilitating prostitution at the WFB brothel, I would welcome hard evidence of this as I&#039;m sure that the general public would be greatly interested to hear about the NHS providing a visiting service to a brothel - not least because in facilitating prostitution the NHS would be directly implicated in aiding and abetting criminal activity, and also directly implicated in facilitating a trade which directly contributes to the maintenance and worsening of public health in regard of sexually transmitted infections!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting confession from pro-prostitution RB, the bit about &#8220;&#8230;women involved in prostitution&#8230;&#8221;!  (Thanks but we already know).  (And that&#8217;s also a working definition under English law of an illegal brothel).  For the record, I am not responsible for the day-to-day operation of BrothelWatch or its activities on the internet; I am really just a figurehead, a public point of contact for the press or the police for what is a covert anti-brothel campaign undertaken by anonymous volunteers.  (As a public figurehead I also serve various tactical purposes of use to the campaign as well).  The photos of cars in the car park that the A-Team sometimes post on their blog are exactly that: photos of cars in a brothel&#8217;s car park, nothing more, and there is nothing illegal about that.</p>
<p>If an NHS health visitor (funded by taxpayers&#8217; money) really is complicit in facilitating prostitution at the WFB brothel, I would welcome hard evidence of this as I&#8217;m sure that the general public would be greatly interested to hear about the NHS providing a visiting service to a brothel &#8211; not least because in facilitating prostitution the NHS would be directly implicated in aiding and abetting criminal activity, and also directly implicated in facilitating a trade which directly contributes to the maintenance and worsening of public health in regard of sexually transmitted infections!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Worsley Road Brothel by Roger Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2009/07/02/worsley-road-brothel/comment-page-1/#comment-25034</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=769#comment-25034</guid>
		<description>It gets even better, I&#039;ve been told today that one of the cars he has pictured only belongs to a health vistor that supply health checks for women involved in prostitution and they have made an official complaint too....

You can only assume that ineptitude on this level must have been cultivated over a long period as I find it impossible to see how someone could commit quite so many &quot;mistakes&quot; otherwise.

Richard the voice you hear in your head almost certainly isn&#039;t god as he is reputed to know all things and you seem to know nothing about anything. Remember those cleaning chemicals need a WELL VENTILATED area ..............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It gets even better, I&#8217;ve been told today that one of the cars he has pictured only belongs to a health vistor that supply health checks for women involved in prostitution and they have made an official complaint too&#8230;.</p>
<p>You can only assume that ineptitude on this level must have been cultivated over a long period as I find it impossible to see how someone could commit quite so many &#8220;mistakes&#8221; otherwise.</p>
<p>Richard the voice you hear in your head almost certainly isn&#8217;t god as he is reputed to know all things and you seem to know nothing about anything. Remember those cleaning chemicals need a WELL VENTILATED area &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Independent pulls out of race by Dave Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/03/04/indepentent-pulls-out-of-race/comment-page-1/#comment-25032</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=1081#comment-25032</guid>
		<description>Steve, can&#039;t believe you think Carvath might get close to 1%. Using the notional results, that would mean he could get 300 votes. No chance he&#039;s going to get more than double figures. And he&#039;ll without doubt come last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, can&#8217;t believe you think Carvath might get close to 1%. Using the notional results, that would mean he could get 300 votes. No chance he&#8217;s going to get more than double figures. And he&#8217;ll without doubt come last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Worsley Road Brothel by Roger Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2009/07/02/worsley-road-brothel/comment-page-1/#comment-25028</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=769#comment-25028</guid>
		<description>Richard has just had to pull down a picture he posted in his brothel campaign that he claimed was the residence of someone connected to the sex industry that his &quot;A team&quot; had got &quot;intelligence&quot; on. It only turns out that the people he thought lived there moved out FIVE YEARS ago and he&#039;s caused distress to a perfectly innocent young family who are distraught at his actions.

He is NOT responsible enough in his actions to post ANYTHING on people in public, after all if he can be FIVE YEARS out on something like this then how much checking can he really be doing!!

It will be interesting to see what legal ramifications will arrise from this latest blunder as I&#039;m imformed that there could well be developments in that area, also to see if he has the decency to offer a public appology for his crass and thoughtless actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard has just had to pull down a picture he posted in his brothel campaign that he claimed was the residence of someone connected to the sex industry that his &#8220;A team&#8221; had got &#8220;intelligence&#8221; on. It only turns out that the people he thought lived there moved out FIVE YEARS ago and he&#8217;s caused distress to a perfectly innocent young family who are distraught at his actions.</p>
<p>He is NOT responsible enough in his actions to post ANYTHING on people in public, after all if he can be FIVE YEARS out on something like this then how much checking can he really be doing!!</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see what legal ramifications will arrise from this latest blunder as I&#8217;m imformed that there could well be developments in that area, also to see if he has the decency to offer a public appology for his crass and thoughtless actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
