Independent pulls out of race
Apparently there’s a story in the paper about cllr. O’Neill pulling out of the General Election campaign. I’m told that he says he’s received a load of hate mail, which has forced him out. It’s an interesting accusation, and one that he apparently hasn’t been willing to back up with any evidence. I’ll have to have a read when I get home.
That he’s given unsubstantiated accusations as his reason for standing down is very surprising, because, I and many others, have known for ages that he was planning on pulling out. O’Neill supposedly told a number of people weeks ago that he’d only stood to upset Norman Owen and he’d never intended to go through with standing. I have a little file of election predictions for Salford on my computer just as a bit of fun for myself: created and last edited 25th Jan 2010 not long after I got the first call telling me Joe was not going to stand – here’s a part of my General Election section:
Election predictions - O'Neill drops out.
Now I know Joe is pretty disgruntled after not getting any support in his campaign to lead the group, but this bizarre silliness and dishonesty really is something he should reflect upon. Is it really right to use the public, and the electoral process to play out a personal vendetta?
Me and the rest of the team are going to get on with our work serving the people of Salford and Swinton, and hope the selfish pettiness fades away into obscurity.
1:02 pm on March 4th, 2010
I am going to win.
1:12 pm on March 4th, 2010
Uh hu. I wonder if there’s an internet smily icon to indicate that someone’s nodding and smiling in order to humour the person they’re communicating with?
2:10 pm on March 4th, 2010
Steve, o.O as a “sideways smiley” seems to indicate a small amount of boggling and raised eyebrow.
2:16 pm on March 4th, 2010
I’m clearly not down with the kids enough. Thanks Dave.
3:12 pm on March 4th, 2010
According to Wikipedia (I’ve just been looking) that (o_O) one indicates “confused, surprised, disturbed”
There’s (¬_¬) for “looking askance / rolling eyes, esp. when around dumb behavior” or (>_>) for disbelief.
They have some subtleties of emotion. There’s even a smiley for “silent resignation”: (v_v)
3:30 pm on March 4th, 2010
Disturbed is probably suitably apt.
5:41 pm on March 4th, 2010
Some other predictions forn you Steve
Richard
Loses his deposit as predicted then comes out with one or all of the following.
He knew he wouldn’t win but wanted to highlight X Y and Z issues and that was why he stood so it was a huge con that did what he wanted.
The media are anti Christian/Carvath and it was a fix
The election was unfair and/or rigged
Whoever wins (unfortunatly probably HB again as it looks now) is in fact satan.
He goes mad tears all his clothes off and embarks on a swathe of destruction with a mop and a can of Mr Muscle after learning he only got four votes. (Everyone one else on hearing he got four votes demands a re-count because it seems to many)
And as a final but much more current prediction Richard is warned again or even charged or taken to court privatly for defemation for a very very stupid act and I’ll even give you a word that will become relevent … Bolton
10:04 pm on March 4th, 2010
Must confess, I never expected Joe to go through with it either, but I saw the “I’m running for Parliament” announcement as a clever wheeze to get some extra publicity for his bid to retain his Council seat. It’s worked, too – a nice big spread in the MEN announcing his bid and then another spread announcing his withdrawal…
10:48 pm on March 4th, 2010
So, to the best of my knowledge, that gets us down to 8 PPCs for Salford and Eccles at the present time: myself and Blears, Owen, Sephton, Henry, Morris, Wakefield and Wingfield.
9:56 am on March 5th, 2010
So you’ve even got the church upset at you now Richard, didn’t have permission and wouldn’t have had even if he’d asked!! Ouch wonder who tipped the priest off ???
Ps Thats not what I was talking about thats just an extra “Carvathian-up” as they are now known.
1:16 pm on March 5th, 2010
Richard, do you mean you are going to “Win” in a landslide electoral victory? or by some other as yet unknown ingenious means?
Perhaps you could win by making a point about elections being equatable to gambling and “by not sinning – you’re winning”?
1:25 pm on March 5th, 2010
I’m doing a new video blog later today which will touch on SalfordOnline’s pathetic attempted hatchet job amongst other things. That video should be up on my YouTube channel in the next 24 hours.
I’m glad that it’s now all official and out in the press that Joe O’Neill has dropped out [you read it first in the public domain on my blog btw]. Joe’s decision to endorse you David Henry I find utterly ridiculous and that’s another subject I’m going to touch upon in my next video.
3:56 pm on March 5th, 2010
I was extremely disturbed to hear of the serious personal threats and intimidation Cllr O’Neil has received leading him to drop out of this year’s General Election campaign. It is shocking the lengths certain political opponents will go to in order to undermine democracy.
I fully welcome Cllr O’Neil’s backing, it is a smart and honourable move and urge others to join us in our fight to stand up for ALL ordinary Salford people who have been utterly failed by the monopoly of the mainstream corporate political parties.
I’m sure people would be interested to know who has endorsed Mr Carvath. Iris Robinson perhaps?
4:31 pm on March 5th, 2010
Are you serouisly now accusing the priesthood of being “out to get you” alongside everyone else Richard?
You filmed a political video without permission in a church, just how stupid are you to not realise that you would need to ask first? Or is it just that most Carvathian of sins arrogence and the belief that normal rules don’t appy to you???????
5:09 pm on March 5th, 2010
I had permission from the Head of the Church. Ask Him if you don’t believe me.
David Henry: your Loony-Left/Militant-Homosexual/Anarchist political agenda would be an unmitigated disaster if you had the opportunity to pursue it as an MP – but that’s not going to happen as I will be the MP for Salford on Eccles on 7th May.
I have a lot of support. Where endorsements are concerned the irony for me is that some highly respected political people do indeed endorse me but because these people are invariably involved in political activism/lobbying through the vehicle of charitable status organisations they cannot openly declare their support for any named political candidate. I also have the endorsement of highly respected political people who already belong to political parties and who therefore cannot openly declare their support (especially in the Conservative Party). [In fact there are many Conservatives - real Conservatives - who would vote for me but would rather jump off a bridge than vote for LGBTory 'conservative' Matthew Sephton.]
6:10 pm on March 5th, 2010
Well I’ve had my dose of laughter for today, I don’t need to bother with Live At The Apollo now…
6:27 pm on March 5th, 2010
Please post his name and I wil be sure to check up and confirm that he is ok with your video and your political use of the church (not to mention some of your more “Carvathian” views)
Its not that we think you would lie of course ……….
6:42 pm on March 5th, 2010
David – I’m sure you’re welcoming any support you can get, in spite of the ‘who is this guy, you’re better off without hime’ comments you made previously, but being told about personal threats and intimidation is not the same as seeing evidence. I’ve not seen any, the press do not seem to have seen any, have you?
7:06 pm on March 5th, 2010
I love to see some proof of Richards often mentioned “Threats to kill” because I know that they are taken very very seriously by the authorities……………….
7:29 pm on March 5th, 2010
For the record, I have certainly never made any threats of any sort to Joe O’Neill. I sent Joe a private email last Saturday evening in which I informed Joe in advance of my intention to make a public statement about my belief in him not being a genuine PPC 2 days hence (i.e. Monday morning gone). I would have no objection to that private email being made public in full as I went out of my way to treat Joe as well as I possibly could, not only in what I wrote but also by virtue of sending the email at all – giving him advanced warning of my intention to blow the whistle.
8:03 pm on March 5th, 2010
I’m talking about the threats to kill YOU keep claiming to have recived Richard.
You must have mentioned that you mave been the recipient of such threats at least fifty times, now everyone thinks your either full of “Carvath” or at the very very least hugly exagerating.
Personaly I think you’ll spot some garbage about “protecting other people” or its “top secret work” but the truth as most of us know is far less exciting and its the overactive imagination of a nobody at work yet again………… unless you can prove otherwise of course
8:42 pm on March 5th, 2010
Ah.
I’ve had all manner of threats made against me in my years as a political activist (including threats of murder).
Most of the threats and intimidation I’ve received have come from homosexuals, muslims, pro-abortionists, persons involved in the brothel business or militant left-wing persons.
Having said that I have also had threats and intimidation from persons involved in freemasonry (and typically police officers or lawyers or belonging to a political party in opposition to the things I stand for). That’s one of the reasons why my attitude towards the Police is ambivalent and I weigh up every officer I encounter on the basis of my dealings with that police officer; I don’t extend any general prejudicial assumption of decency or good motive to any police officer even though they are supposed to be ‘the good guys’ – and increasingly I find that police officers are of lower and lower moral calibre, so corrupted with anti-moral political correctness that they don’t know right from wrong. Sadly I’ve had far more negative experiences of police officers than positive – and obviously I’m a good guy! I’ll never forget the time that a Salford PC who I’d never met and didn’t know at all came up to me in the street and quite unprovoked started ranting at me with f-ing this and that (because he was a corrupt and depraved individual opposed to me simply because I’m a Christian). When the Police behvae like that it’s no wonder they are devoid of moral authority.
9:59 am on March 6th, 2010
So no details and a genralised rant about most of thhe population of the UK (If you count those pro-choice and those who would be against the draconian level of what YOU term pornography and would like to ban I’d say in the 90%+ )
So we’re the bad guys and your the good guy and you wonder why people call you delusional …………..
As expected no details of the “Death threats” but a good excuse as to why thhey won’t have been reported though, what a surprise….
2:01 am on March 7th, 2010
Despite your imaginary fears Richard, you have always been welcomed with warm loving arms at several of our public meetings.
Here’s a snippet from an email Mr Carvath sent me last July:
“You are clearly intelligent, articulate and passionate about politics so perhaps you will stand for Parliament yourself in the future… but tame those anarchistic tendencies just a little first!
British politics needs a good shake-up but anarchy is a step too far! Have you thought of joining the Labour Party?
If you give it a go then in time to come you might really make your mark.”
- You said it Richard!
11:25 am on March 7th, 2010
More to the point WHO EXACTLY gave you permission to film inside the church Richard??
IS this “Head of the church” that you refer to a living person or was it one of your imaginery conversations with God or JC ???
Oh and I owe you an apolagy of sorts too, the other Carvathian-up that I predicted would break this week will be next week now due to various factors so my guess at timing was wrong so I’m sorry xx
5:21 pm on March 7th, 2010
I think Roger it is fairly clear that Richard was implying that he had God’s permission to film in the church.
6:31 pm on March 7th, 2010
I’m of the same mind as you and probably Steve too that in fact that is what Richard means but it would be interesting to hear him clear this up.
For example Ian it would be helpfull to know how God contacts Richard, are we talking burning bush dreams or is this a more up to date God who uses fax or even E-mail !!
Why does the Allmighty over-rule his own clergy for Dickie would be interesting too don’t you think ? I had a dream that the townsfolk of Salford impaled Richard on a long mop handle and used him as a flag and declared Salford a seperate country the other night, does he think this was a message from God for me to start sharpening a big stick or was it the cheese I had before bed ??
So many questions that can only be answered by a man in direct contact, we are blessed that we are the ones that know Dickie now before this gets out and his inevitable climb to the very peak of power means that asking him such questions will be impossible…..
PS Can you ask if Elvis is in residence or not for he Richard as the odds would make some inside information very useful..
6:47 pm on March 7th, 2010
I’m not sure how Richard expects you to “Ask Him if you don’t believe me” (Re: having permission from the Head of the Church)
“Dear Father. So, um, when Richard made this YouTube video he did have your permission, right? Amen”
12:52 pm on March 8th, 2010
You may as well answer the question of who you think gave you permission Richard because I can assure you that it will be asked every time you comment or do an interview between now and the election until you do xxx
9:56 pm on March 9th, 2010
Steve, can’t believe you think Carvath might get close to 1%. Using the notional results, that would mean he could get 300 votes. No chance he’s going to get more than double figures. And he’ll without doubt come last.
8:10 am on March 11th, 2010
You’ll note that my prediction is <1% – less than one percent. I think we probably agree on this.
12:13 pm on March 11th, 2010
I will win.
12:49 pm on March 11th, 2010
Did God tell you that when he gave you permission to film in church by any chance Richard?
Don’t worry about making a public statment about that or the fiasco with that house because I’m sure you’ll find that the phones will be red hot on your advertised radio interview asking those questions and we can hear your answers then..
4:28 pm on March 11th, 2010
You must know something I don’t RB. I’ve agreed to do a live interview with Mark Whitehead. I’ve not agreed to taking questions on air direct from members of the public phoning in. If indeed that’s what Salford City Radio has in mind then it should notify me quick sharp because nobody has said anything to me about taking part in any phone-in session. I’ve already warned Salford City Radio that if they think they’re going to attempt some Paxmanesque stunt then they’ll get the full guns blazing Carvath treatment back – which is a level of intensity I rarely go to, and only when absolutely necessary – but I will fire a full point-blank broadside if the need arises. I’m already sick of smart-ass journalists and the more scum elements of the Salford public [typically left-wing extremists] and so I do operate a ’shoot on sight, shoot to kill’ policy on slanderers and character assassins. If I turn up and I assess Mark Whitehead as being motivated only to make mischief then I’ll just walk out as I won’t have my time wasted. Furthermore if he presents me with pre-prepared awkward questions that are obviously loaded and unreasonable to be asked on the spot [but which would be fine given the opportunity for prior preparation] then, again, I’ll just be off – not least because the audience figure for Salford City Radio is probably tiny so it’s barely worth the bother for the potential benefit anyway.
8:13 pm on March 11th, 2010
So you don’t think that asking a candidate about his feeling that he has divine permission to film in church despite whatever the priest says or that your incomptent enough to put a picture of the wrong house and still not publicly appologise might just be relevent to what sort of person is standing to be an MP and how competent he would be in the job??
10:20 pm on March 11th, 2010
If Mark Whitehead asks me about filming in Eccles Parish Church or about a photo not posted by me on somebody else’s blog then I’ll answer him. Mark Whitehead is a real human being who I presumably won’t find wearing a paper bag over his head in the studio. You on the other hand are an anonymous coward on the internet – he who talks about fighting face-to-face in a boxing ring but who won’t even show his face on the web! – and so there is hardly any obligation upon me to answer to you. Indeed any response I make to you is an indulgence at my discretion.
10:46 pm on March 11th, 2010
It wasn’t MY house that was posted Richard and neither was it ME who wanted you to remove the U tube video.
It was the family who where slandered and the priest that was upset by your underhanded fimlming without permission. You talk about anonymous cowards then doesn’t that fit the person who posted a picture of someone else’s house and haven’t even got the decency to put their name to an apology ??
I do hope that your quite happy to be the person who ends up in court with the libel of posting the picture as I’ve been told thats a distinct possibility and considering the five year gap then negligence should be fairly simple to prove don’t you think?
You are incapable of addmitting a mistake Richard and considering the number you make thats shocking and as a suposed Christian your refusal to even respect the priest’s wishes in his own church shows the level of regard you have for the church as opposed to you isatiable desire for attention.
10:42 am on March 12th, 2010
Perhaps you should join the police
9:29 pm on March 12th, 2010
Interesting suggestion, if I did you’d probably have met me by now for sure wouldn’t you…..
10:56 pm on March 12th, 2010
I might be dating a police officer at the moment for all you know…
10:58 pm on March 12th, 2010
Do tell…what’s his name?
11:25 pm on March 12th, 2010
Dixgood of Dock’s Green
11:27 pm on March 12th, 2010
Dock Green. typo =)
9:27 am on March 13th, 2010
Lol Joanne and Steve…..
Your giving your imaginery friend imaginery jobs now Richard thats real dedication…….
11:31 am on March 13th, 2010
Ps Am I the only one that thinks it looks like Richard is morphing into the penguin from the batman film in that picture of him on the top of his site ?
1:37 pm on March 13th, 2010
I’ll take your word Roger – I don’t bother looking at his site.
12:32 am on March 14th, 2010
It is a hideously unflattering picture. I thought the Salford Advertiser like to use it every time because it makes him look a bit like a Dick Tracy villain. I’ve no idea why he uses it himself.
12:17 pm on March 14th, 2010
As a rule Joanne the physical looks wouldn’t be an issue, but in Richards case after all his comments on how women drool over him constantly to the point of inventing women to say how sexy he is (very very disturbed behaviour) and posing in vests to ask what women think (not much unless it was for comedy value for what I’ve been told) you just can’t help finding the choice of picture interesting (unless of course thats the best he can get)
11:20 pm on March 15th, 2010
We’ve yet to see your photo on the web RB…
10:55 am on March 16th, 2010
What you mean is YOU haven’t seen my photo Richard, a far far larger number of people have seen my photo on the web it’s just that you don’t know where to look.
In fact you probably have seen my photo Richard and we have met and spoken in the course of my work but you just din’t know who I was. x
12:39 pm on March 16th, 2010
Thanks for your testimony to your ongoing deliberately deceitful modus operandi and evil intent. Such cowardice: attacking a fully identified person from anonymity. Pathetic. Still, you’ve been doing this now for 9 months so you are clearly never going to volunteer your identity on the web. Regardless of the idiocy of most of what you write, the mere fact of your anonymity alone renders your credibility as zero. So if you choose to persist with your anonymous idiocy then it is of no consequence to me – in fact it suits me very well. I have information on you RB but it suits me better not to reveal what I know about you for the time being. I know you’re intimately connected with prostitution.
4:10 pm on March 16th, 2010
Actually Richard you where closer with your Stonewall reference (In said closer not correct). I disagree with YOUR approach but very much agree with Joe and Steve’s reasons for wanting this place closed down and even more so I have put Joe in touch with certain people in official positions that might be able to assist in that ends.
If you had enough inteligence to google this name you may well have worked out in a political sense what area of the country I originate from and who the first person I ever voted for was.
I disagree from a moral and legal standpoint on your putting pictures of women and private houses (and that goes double when you don’t check your facts first) but I detest your bigotry towords homosexuals and your sexisum towords women but more than anything else I hate the fact you try and hide your hatred behind being a Christian. I would have described myself of being of the Christian faith until I read some of your rants Richard but on the last work related assesment I filled in I ticked the agnostic box for thhe first time in my life. If your views are what it means to being a Christian thhen I want no part of it. There are certain restrictions on my political activities Richard but I can assure you that being opposed to you on any number of issues has never brought me any conflict at all and in fact I should thank you simply because you’ve opened my eye’s to problems and discriminations certain people endure that I in my closeted little view had assumed where a thing of the past.
2:28 pm on March 17th, 2010
Be careful; you’ve just effectively admitted that Roger Berry isn’t your real name!
You’ll be telling us what your real name is next (perhaps before I do)…
4:51 pm on March 17th, 2010
In fact Roger Berry was the person who first piqed my interest in political debate who after a debate with my father converted him from being a life-long Conservative voter. Considering the topic was law and order and my father had been involved in one way or another his whole life it was impressive to say the least.
In fact Richard my name and occupation is irrelevent but you seem to have some obsesion with it, my points ARE relevent and I’ve seen the effect of obsessed and hate filled people like you on comunities far too many times. You are at least as bad as any redical islamic and just as representative of the religions you claim you stand for.
I beleive in the law Richard ALL of it you just want to pick and chose bits and I have faith that it will backfire on you sooner rather than later.
5:33 pm on March 17th, 2010
Your name and occupation is totally relevant. The fact that you hide in anonymity but attack a public person in the seriously defamatory manner in which you do speaks volumes. You are a coward. You simply would not write the garbage about me that you do if like me your name, photo, location, occupation and other details were publically connected to what you write. Your description of me – an English orthodox evangelical Christian standing for rigorously Christian and traditionally British standards on social and political issues – as “hate filled” just goes to show how utterly perverted you are in your thinking.
6:07 pm on March 17th, 2010
Its a very very common term used in describing you and your political views on issues such as homosexuality and Islam Richard ask Steve if he would disagree with my usage of that or find it innacurate at all?
I know that Joe agrees so does every other politicaly active person in Salford, I doubt you could find three active political candidates or councilers who whould find call your views “hate filled” as unwarrented Richard. Almost every single person (not the one you make up) who has ever comentated on you has said something similar.
Of course you won’t be able to find anyone to disagree and you’ll rant about them coming on here and saying so and if they do you’ll dismiss them as “political enemies”. Funny how none of the othhers talk about each other like that , ask Norman if Matthew is driven by hate or vice-versa even Blears wouldn’t describe anyone but you with that term.
You are either despised or laughed at (often both) by all the real political figures Richard its a fact you are just to deluded to see it, I challange you to find someone to refute that (you won’t sweetie trust me xx)
7:34 pm on March 17th, 2010
It would be interesting I suppose to formally canvass the views of all 60 of Salford’s councillors in regard of myself – and also in regard of major social and political issues with a clear moral dimension. (I mean what they would commit to on public record).
I would, for example, find it curious indeed to have a councillor express the opinion that I’m “hate filled” and yet state their full support for abortion. [Murdering babies... now that's hate!]
I won’t be canvassing Salford’s councillors in such a manner any time soon though, not least because most of them wouldn’t commit to giving answers on public record.
Indeed it is notoriously difficult to get many of Salford’s councillors to commit to or speak out on the big issues.
For example, Iain Lindley has been repeatedly asked to state his views on pornography and prostitution but he has steadfastly avoided doing so.
Another example… last November I broke the ‘Salford story of the century so far’ as reported by the Salford Advertiser, namely 3,707 people murdered by abortion at Salford Royal Hospital between 2004 and 2008. [Of course it should've been the front page story; instead it got a brief, poor write-up on page 14.]
What was the response from ANY of Salford’s 60 councillors on this information going public?
No response.
Silence.
2 to 3 people are being murdered for every day of the year at Salford Royal but not one councillor has had anything to say about this!
Absolutely disgusting and shameful.
Salford City Council’s councillors are complicit in causing all manner of evil in the City of Salford with devastating consequences.
Salford City Council supports the murder by abortion of Salford’s unborn citizens.
Salford City Council supports ’sex educating’ Salford’s children despite the mountain of irrefutable evidence which proves that the more kids are ’sex educated’ the worse the problems of unwanted teenage pregnancy, abortion, STDs and dysfunctional families become.
I certainly don’t care what any Salford councillor may think about me.
I’m the good guy.
They’re the ones perpetrating unspeakable evil and devastation upon the very people they are supposed to serve and represent.
Good men are always despised by evil men; there’s nothing remarkable about that.
8:17 pm on March 17th, 2010
And all that has what to do with your homophobic and racist hate comments exactly Richard?
Why are YOU banned fron so very many places (court, various blogs (sadly including Joe’s now too) Salford Online even the church has had a priest speak out against your actions, you’ve been spoken to and warned on a number of issues by the police just to name a few)
Are you the only “good” man in Salford in your view Richard and if not please name another and I will Email some of the best of your comments to get a response on them to see what a “Carvathian” good man thinks of you and the hate you spew.
You want to talk about abortion because we all call you a homaphobic or sexist little ginger excuse for a man and that make sense how ?
You ARE laughed at or detested in equal measure Richard by almost all that know about you and just because you support the odd cause that some good people do it doesn’t change the rest of your hate filled bile that you inflict on people in the slightest and everyone other than you knows it…… x
8:56 pm on March 17th, 2010
You make an artform out of talking bollocks.
I’m not a racist. Therefore there is of course no evidence for your defamatory claim.
In fact there is plenty of photo/video evidence of me on the web associating with black and Asian people). Furthermore, some of my biggest supporters are black and Asian people.
I’m not a ‘homophobe’ either [if by 'homophobe' you mean 'a hater of homosexual people'] and there is no evidence to support that defamatory claim of yours either.
I am opposed to Islam – this does not equate to racism.
I am opposed to homosexual behaviour – this does not equate to hating people who engage in such behaviour.
You clearly think you have your finger on the pulse of Salford’s councillors. Perhaps you should ask them whether any of them are willing to take me on in public debate… after all if they feel so strongly against me then surely they’re willing to engage in public debate? I doubt you’d get any takers though; councillors like Iain Lindley and Joe O’Neill are running scared when they suppress free and fair debate on their blogs… if they can’t cope with debate on their blogs then they’re certainly not going to rise to the challenge of debate in person.
Or how about Matthew Sephton, Conservative PPC for Salford and Eccles? He’s been asked to state publicly about what he wants to do with little boys and girls in the classroom – talking to primary school children about sex and homosexuality (his sex-ed policy). There’s been no response from Sephton, so I’m going to have to tell parents in Salford and Eccles that their homosexual Conservative PPC isn’t willing to say what his sex policy is towards their children.
9:35 pm on March 17th, 2010
No Richard what you SHOULD say is the truth and that is that Matthew like all the other real candidates doesn’t see you as worth engaging with or being worthy or a response.
Should a REAL political figure ask him for a debate or an answer I’m sure he would do so but your a joke Dickie some sort of delusional little sideshow and nothing more, people aren’t scared of debating with you Richard they pity you, poor old deluded dickie as a quite well known Salford political figure calls you.
Do you think terms like “botty licker” will be accepted as a religous view devoid of malice Richard? I have a list of qoutes of that nature that you can be assured will be used if and when you are finally charged and furthermore I can tell you now that VERY few real Christians will want to be linked to those sort of childish and insulting comments. You think you gat a huge amount of support as in the case in Liverpool recently don’t you Richard but think again because you’ve provided so many insults beyond a religious disaprooval that they won’t touch you with a barge pole because you’d infect a religious view with blatent hatered and they are far too media savy to risk that for an insignificant little thing like you.
Hatred spews out of every pore when you comment on the homosexual lifestye Richard and the stench of the bile you spew is there for every normal thinking person to plainly smell. You rant about marriage but don’t seem to have a wife or even a girlfriend, you rave about whats happening to our kids but again what the hell do you know about raising a child ?? Your a 33 year old single cleaner Richard desperatly looking for a cause, anything that will give you a meaning and excuse your lack of ever doing anything of note, you have no real friends Richard just people whose causes you tag along with and you spend all your time running your mouth off at people who do serve the community while making pathetic excuses as to why you keep being overlooked or banned.
You damage every cause that you put your name to, and the excuses after te election will be hilarious (do you know there is a sweepstake on what you’ll blame losing your deposit on btw?)
You ARE a nasty little homophobic dwarf Richard and you are getting exactly what you deserve out of life and that if nothing else makes me think that there must be a just god somewhere. xx
11:22 pm on March 17th, 2010
What a depraved and evil-minded person you are.
11:43 pm on March 17th, 2010
And what a foul mouthed little bigot you are.
How many policeman, teachers and social workers got assolted and hurt serving the public last year Richard and how many oven cleaners?
You’ve called all of those proffesions “evil” and insulted them all but you’d be the first to come running to us if you got a hiding because of the hate and provacation you preach and stir.
People like that serve because they want to in the most Richard not because they want to be noticed or for the attention. Steve and Joe put in the hours because they want to help people but whatever you save its obvious to everyone that you just want to feel relevent or important.
At least The BNP are honest about their bigotry but you hide yours behind being a Christian, your not even man enough to admit to yours and just try and hide them behind the bible so take a long and honest look in the mirror before you throw words like coward and evil minded about Richard.
1:05 am on March 18th, 2010
Are you trying to say that you are a police officer?
Why don’t you just stop your cowardice and reveal your identity?
Your hiding in anonymity is pathetic.
Have you any idea how idiotic you sound (making statements about me only being in politics for attention, about me preaching hate and hiding bigotry behind Christianity)?
I do a simply enormous amount of work at my own expense for the good of everybody in society. Most of this work is not in the public domain. Unlike councillors I receive no payment for the work I do but what I do actually costs me heavily. I don’t make a song and dance about everything I do (though perhaps I should – as I might get more respect). To many more people than you would like to accept, I am an accomplished and respected political activist.
Your constant efforts to try and frighten me with talk about the Police arresting and charging me with thought crimes relating to my pro-heterosexual views are a waste of time.
I don’t care what Stonewall, Outrage, Iain Lindley, Matthew Sephton, the Labour Party, Greater Manchester Police or anybody else thinks about my pro-heterosexual views.
If GMP think I’m a criminal then they can take me on… it’s not happened so far.
GMP won’t take me on because they know I’ll blow seven shades of the brown sauce out of them in court if they do (not to mention having a field day with the international media platform that any prosecution would afford me).
The public are ’sick to death’ of homosexuality being rammed down their throats. Homosexual is not normal, it has harmful consequences and it is morally evil; it used to be illegal and it still should be in the best interests of homosexuals themselves and society as a whole. I have several political goals and one of them is certainly to crush and destroy the homosexual political agenda… I would relish the opportunity to start that work in a criminal trial, so my message to GMP is: “Make my day, punk.”
10:25 am on March 18th, 2010
I’m not trying to say anything Richard other than you are a very sick and twisted little man.
Their won’t be any “Inernational media” Richard or any support from the Christian institute, you see I’ve suspected for along time that being charged is exactly what you want so I’ve been saving some of your worst insults and I’ve even sent a list of them to a few noted Christian opponents of homosexuality (without putting your name to them) to ask if in their opinion the comments are made from a Christian standpoint. Interestingly all three (no I’m not telling you who because if you ARE charged the list of your comments and thhe responses will be Emailed to every paper and Christian group I can find BEFORE any stories are written or support is offered) distanced a Christian objection on grounds of faith from your comments. One called you “misguided” and another said that “the language and tone of these comments are not in line with any Christian teachings of love towords the sinner”.
I know you won’t beleive me Richard so try it yourself, send some of your “botty lickers”, “widge in mouth lovers” “child molesters” comments to a TRUE Christian opponent for their view and see what they reply with.
I will personally see that you have no support fron anywhere sweetie and trust me I have dealt with the press far far more than you have and even have some people I’d call friends working in national media so I know exactly of what I speak unlike you.
Do you think GMP are stupid Richard? If you are charged I predict it will be just AFTER thhe election after all paperwork takes time you know and police officers are VERY busy people and on occation some things can get held up, after all its not like you are going anywhere is it sweetie so why do anything in a timescale that might benefit you?
All of my views on you are widly held Richard and I think deep down you know that don’t you and thats why you have so much to say about police officers, teachers, social workers etc because you would love to be one but your just not good enough so the only way you can deal with you sense of rejection and insignificance is to shoot your mouth off.
nobody is going to give with the platform for publicity and attention you crave Richard because they know it hurts you more you be ignored than to publicly crush and humiliate you in a debate however easy it would be to do, you just sit quietly in the obscurity of the very back of the classroom like a good little boy dickie and it doesn’t matter how much you hold your hand up or jump up and down in frustration your never going to be picked so get used to it and get back to those ovens so at least you’ll have something to show for your life even if it is only a clean cooker for a few weeks……….xxx
12:30 pm on March 18th, 2010
What a seriously depraved and evil person you are. As I’ve pointed out many times before, whenever you attribute words or phrases to me in quotation marks [ " " ], the words or phrases are either fabricated or else out of context. You are clearly obsessed with me and also with my pro-heterosexual views (though, remarkably, you claim not to be a homosexual). I find that very sad. I’m aware that homosexuals have complained to the police – accusing me of ‘homophobic hate crime’ more than once in recent months. Complaining about ‘homophobia’ is a hobby for these people. These people need help to be healed from homosexuality; it’s very sad that the State currently encourages them to think that their homosexual behaviour is normal and harmless and fosters a victim mentality in them. I feel great pity for these homosexuals; I hope they get the help they need. If GMP want to pursue a politico-ideological-thought-crime prosecution against me at any time then that’s their business. GMP is already politicised and is actively in cahoots with Stonewall. I’m really not bothered whatever they do, if they do anything. A major headline-grabbing trial affording me the opportunity to defend every Englishman’s free speech rights and the rights of the 99% heterosexual majority to protect their children from exposure to homosexuality is just what I need to take my political activism to the next level. Yes please! [ 'Unfortunately' I've not committed any crime so it won't happen.] The whole British nation is ready for this showdown: pro-heterosexual Richard Carvath versus the pro-homosexual ‘criminal justice’ system. Whoa… let’s get it on!
2:17 pm on March 18th, 2010
Again Richard you think that YOU will be the person that brings this to national attention, you won’t.
Even the Christian groups campaigning against homosexuality don’t want to be linked with your comments believe me I’ve been quietly sending little snipets of your rants to a number of places and individuals just to ensure that if a prosecution does come nobody will want to touch you.
You see yourself as some manipulator extronidare behind the scenes don’t you? Your not in fact you’ve fallen for every little gambit or snare anyone has set for you, it’s so predictable and in doing so you have revealed your TRUE feelings about a number of subjects Richard. Your argument with Mr Tippets was a classic example and your infantile responses on your own blog (yes I copied them all) would be one nail in your coffin and any number of insults (not religion based comments but insults and there is a difference) will be another.
The only people that even might support you will be the openly anti-gay groups and them doing so will be a very telling thing in itself. The nice comment you made on your hilarious U-tube video about having permission from “The head of the church to film” will be another media story of interest and the fact I’ve Emailed a few people in the church to ask and they have all denied any contact and backed the priest’s call for you to remove it is great news to. PPC claims to speak to god will be a fantastic headline and some little extracts about your comments on women from Salford Online then a few mentions of your views on women with cancer and models being prostitutes etc. All told you’ll make David Icke look like the sanest person in Britain Dickie.
Before you ask why again its because I detest your bigotry Richard your a nasty little hate filled little creature so AFTER the election I agree .. lets get it on (and do try to take notes while your credabilety and character are being systematicly dismantled in case you ever decide to try and play in a big arena again won’t you)
3:15 pm on March 18th, 2010
If you want to ‘get it on’ you’ll have to reveal your identity. You have thought of that, haven’t you?
Your obsession with me is tragic – not to mention extremely illogical (in that you’ve spent dozens and dozens of hours of your life obsessing over me in the last few months despite asserting that I’m of no significance – bizarre).
This thread has become extremely repetetive and you are, in truth, a complete waste of my time, so with this comment I’m signing off from this thread and I’m also signing off from any further interaction with you on this or any other blog. Today is seven weeks to go to the General Election and I have work to do. I will leave you in peace to persist endlessly in your folly as a dog returns to its vomit. Goodbye (Adieu).
4:09 pm on March 18th, 2010
Ok then but two final points for you to consider Richard,
I don’t HAVE to reveal anything if I CHOOSE to I will if I didn’t it would be just as easy to send everything to the people that they would be of interest to without doing so or even doing so to them just not to you.
When I say your insignificant I mean (as I have told you before but you just can’t get it into your head) is politically and personally you are insignificant but socially you have a limited significance and psychologically your very interesting but then again is David Icke.