<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Save the Salford Advertiser?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/01/save-the-salford-advertiser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/01/save-the-salford-advertiser/</link>
	<description>Political Musings from Greater Manchester</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 08:30:32 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6-beta1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/01/save-the-salford-advertiser/comment-page-1/#comment-24987</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=998#comment-24987</guid>
		<description>No - it&#039;s a sad state of affairs, and it looks like the staff were kept in the dark too. I guess we&#039;re all hoping that the possibility that we may be coming out of recession (I&#039;m hoping but not taking the chancellor&#039;s word just yet), together with the change in ownership of the paper, may yet result in things getting a little better for the Advertiser and its readers. My understanding is that distribution was cut to areas where the there was least return for advertisers for their expenditure - must be because we&#039;re all counting the pennies at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8211; it&#8217;s a sad state of affairs, and it looks like the staff were kept in the dark too. I guess we&#8217;re all hoping that the possibility that we may be coming out of recession (I&#8217;m hoping but not taking the chancellor&#8217;s word just yet), together with the change in ownership of the paper, may yet result in things getting a little better for the Advertiser and its readers. My understanding is that distribution was cut to areas where the there was least return for advertisers for their expenditure &#8211; must be because we&#8217;re all counting the pennies at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Headford</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/01/save-the-salford-advertiser/comment-page-1/#comment-24986</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Headford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=998#comment-24986</guid>
		<description>I for 1 did not receive the flyer but I have not received the Advertiser since 26/1 although friends 2 roads either side of mine &amp; the road at the bottom end of mine are still receiving them. People in my road are not aware of this &amp; the allocated shop that we can pay 30p for it is 10 mins walk away.
I contacted the Advertiser through email &amp; was  told &#039;TOUGH&#039; more or less. I have also written to the readers letter page but to date my letter has not been published but then I didn&#039;t expect it to as it would not have been good publicity for the Advertiser.
I shouldn&#039;t think that firms that advertise will be very happy about the situation either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for 1 did not receive the flyer but I have not received the Advertiser since 26/1 although friends 2 roads either side of mine &amp; the road at the bottom end of mine are still receiving them. People in my road are not aware of this &amp; the allocated shop that we can pay 30p for it is 10 mins walk away.<br />
I contacted the Advertiser through email &amp; was  told &#8216;TOUGH&#8217; more or less. I have also written to the readers letter page but to date my letter has not been published but then I didn&#8217;t expect it to as it would not have been good publicity for the Advertiser.<br />
I shouldn&#8217;t think that firms that advertise will be very happy about the situation either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Middleton</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/01/save-the-salford-advertiser/comment-page-1/#comment-24845</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Middleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 20:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=998#comment-24845</guid>
		<description>It seems the situation is that GMG/MEN are halting some free deliveries of the Salford Advertiser, notably in the M3/M4/M5/M7 postcode areas and only readers in those areas received the &quot;flyer insert&quot; informing them that their free deliveries were ending.

The Advertiser/GMG/MEN have been surprisingly vague - but then who can blame them, it&#039;s hardly good PR!

Incidently, some Prestwich Advertiser readers are reporting the same problem - so this may be a wider &quot;reorganisation&quot; of the paper&#039;s delivery areas across the North West.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems the situation is that GMG/MEN are halting some free deliveries of the Salford Advertiser, notably in the M3/M4/M5/M7 postcode areas and only readers in those areas received the &#8220;flyer insert&#8221; informing them that their free deliveries were ending.</p>
<p>The Advertiser/GMG/MEN have been surprisingly vague &#8211; but then who can blame them, it&#8217;s hardly good PR!</p>
<p>Incidently, some Prestwich Advertiser readers are reporting the same problem &#8211; so this may be a wider &#8220;reorganisation&#8221; of the paper&#8217;s delivery areas across the North West.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venus</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/01/save-the-salford-advertiser/comment-page-1/#comment-24833</link>
		<dc:creator>Venus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 02:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=998#comment-24833</guid>
		<description>Steve, you&#039;re article is fact-of-the-matter and not sensationalist in the slightest. People have a right to ask questions.

Tom, didn&#039;t Pamela Welsh (probably under orders from above?) warn you directly via Twitter not to cover it? See the How-two website for the statement from the M.E.N. At least some people have not bowed down to pressure and have had the courage and  to have gone through other channels to investigate for themselves - mostly because they care about their local newspapers, not because rivals wish to revel their demise or anything like that.

It is clear the reports by How-to and Salford Youth Council (and now the Salford Star with details of which postcode areas are affected) were not &quot;complete nonsense&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, you&#8217;re article is fact-of-the-matter and not sensationalist in the slightest. People have a right to ask questions.</p>
<p>Tom, didn&#8217;t Pamela Welsh (probably under orders from above?) warn you directly via Twitter not to cover it? See the How-two website for the statement from the M.E.N. At least some people have not bowed down to pressure and have had the courage and  to have gone through other channels to investigate for themselves &#8211; mostly because they care about their local newspapers, not because rivals wish to revel their demise or anything like that.</p>
<p>It is clear the reports by How-to and Salford Youth Council (and now the Salford Star with details of which postcode areas are affected) were not &#8220;complete nonsense&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Rodgers</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/01/save-the-salford-advertiser/comment-page-1/#comment-24829</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Rodgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=998#comment-24829</guid>
		<description>Yeah, sorry for the pointed reply, just have to be careful with media relations these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, sorry for the pointed reply, just have to be careful with media relations these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/01/save-the-salford-advertiser/comment-page-1/#comment-24827</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=998#comment-24827</guid>
		<description>Shockingly lazy journalistic sensationalism on my part. I hope you&#039;ll forgive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shockingly lazy journalistic sensationalism on my part. I hope you&#8217;ll forgive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Rodgers</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/01/save-the-salford-advertiser/comment-page-1/#comment-24826</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Rodgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=998#comment-24826</guid>
		<description>Steve,

We didn&#039;t &quot;latch on to&quot; the story. We asked Pamela Welsh what the situation was (via Twitter) and she provided us with an email address to ask for comment from MEN Media. We have received no response to date. We have not published any article or story on this on SalfordOnline.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>We didn&#8217;t &#8220;latch on to&#8221; the story. We asked Pamela Welsh what the situation was (via Twitter) and she provided us with an email address to ask for comment from MEN Media. We have received no response to date. We have not published any article or story on this on SalfordOnline.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aled</title>
		<link>http://www.stevecooke.org/2010/01/save-the-salford-advertiser/comment-page-1/#comment-24824</link>
		<dc:creator>Aled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stevecooke.org/?p=998#comment-24824</guid>
		<description>They have stopped delivering to our house since before Christmas. It is very sad if it is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have stopped delivering to our house since before Christmas. It is very sad if it is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
